Could We Prevent Displacing the Undisplaced Fracture Neck of Femur? To the Editor

To the Editor: I have read the article “Progression of a fracture site impaction as a prognostic indicator of impacted femoral neck fracture treated with multiple pinning” by Yoon et al. in the current issue of your esteemed journal and congratulate the authors. Yet, I would like to elaborate on a few important relevant concepts in the same regard. Th e authors have not considered the other vector in the femoral neck collapse. The articulo-trochanteric distance (ATD) in the article and also in the ‘capital impaction index’ by Shimizu et al., is only the ‘vertical’ vector of the femoral neck collapse force. Th is vector only indicates the ‘shear’ and not the ‘impaction’ at the fracture site, as is indicated in the title. Th e true impaction at the fracture site will be determined by the ‘horizontal’ ATD, that is from the medial most point of head articular surface to the tangent drawn along the lateral most part of the greater trochanter. Hence, more the impaction, greater the decrease in the ‘horizontal’ ATD and lesser the change in the ‘vertical’ ATD. Like-wise, greater the shear at the fracture site, greater the decrease in the ‘vertical’ ATD than ‘horizontal’ ATD. With this background, it is stated in this article that there was a greater decrease in the ‘vertical’ ATD index in the unsuccessful patients i.e., 36% at 3 months (as compared to 7% in successful patients). A decrease in the ‘vertical’ ATD indicates a shear which means a higher type Pauwel’s angle (type III). It would have been very useful if the Pauwel’s fracture confi guration in the unsuccessful patients would have been stated in the article. Now the trend in osteosynthesis is towards using an angle stable implant in Pauwel’s type III neck femur fractures rather than pins or screws to counter the shear. Some even prefer a valgus osteotomy with screws to convert shear into compression. At this point, I would want to know, if a preoperative CT scan be useful to determine the Pauwel’s angle in an undisplaced neck femur fracture and then embark on the operative plan rather than waiting for the decrease in ‘vertical’ ATD in the postoperative period. If the angle is high, a fixed angle implant be preferred over pins at the primary fi xation itself. Th e age range of participants is 28 to 86 years. Osteomalacia is very common among patients with neck femur fracture. Th e authors have not mentioned the mode of trauma and have not screened any patients, especially with undisplaced neck femur fracture, for osteomalacia. Th e authors have also not mentioned about any perioperative and postoperative calcium and vitamin D supplementation which aff ects healing and collapse. Some papers discount the value of vitamin D levels in elderly but calcium supplementation is advisable. I also wish to suggest the use of AO 6.5 partially threaded cannulated cancellous screws be better than using Knowles pins with sharp pointed tips in osteoporotic bone. Th e possibility of joint penetration in Fig. 4 in the article could have been possibly averted.